linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87v7l17e8g.fsf@yellow.woof>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:19:27 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Paul Walmsley
 <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt
 <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti
 <alex@...ti.fr>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test

Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de> writes:
> Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com> writes:
>> Could you maybe change that into "__ASSEMBLER__" instead of "__ASSEMBLY__" ? 
>> I'm currently trying to get rid of the latter in the kernel sources, see: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250606070952.498274-1-thuth@redhat.com/
>
> It's been applied, it's up to riscv's maintainers how we should do this.
>
> I can send v3, or a follow-up patch.
>
> Or riscv maintainers can also squash that change into this patch, or
> into your patch.
>
> I'm fine with any options.

Riscv pull request is already created. A follow-up patch it is then.

Nam