[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250929115803.GF2617119@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:58:03 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@...gle.com>,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@...gle.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/arm-smmu-v3: Implement .iotlb_sync_map
callback
On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 10:39:53PM +0000, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> @@ -3700,6 +3713,7 @@ static const struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> .map_pages = arm_smmu_map_pages,
> .unmap_pages = arm_smmu_unmap_pages,
> .flush_iotlb_all = arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all,
> + .iotlb_sync_map = arm_smmu_iotlb_sync_map,
Shouldn't this avoid defining the op on coherent systems?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists