[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mee9JvcOCAqQxcCMBE7gUQWvZaM=wDAfyKTG5bKyZeHTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:41:08 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, linus.walleij@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: Add Tegra410 support
On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 9:24 AM Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Conor,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch!
>
> On 19/09/25 22:44, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 03:06:26PM +0530, Kartik Rajput wrote:
> >> From: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com>
> >>
> >> Add the port definitions for the main GPIO controller found on
> >> Tegra410.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Why are you modifying a binding header for devicetree when the driver
> > only appear to grow acpi support?
> >
>
> Although Tegra410 is ACPI-only and does not require a new compatible string,
> we chose to add the GPIO port definitions to the DT binding header to stay
> consistent with previous Tegra SoCs.
>
> Thanks,
> Kartik
>
Hi!
The kernel policy is not to add symbols nobody is using. Please drop them.
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists