lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gd00bRjoDjNdzFMVcQe3yQvy=OC=ZA7Dr-OxL_iP+x6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:59:55 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>, 
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] PM: runtime: Auto-cleanup macros for runtime PM

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 1:15 PM Jonathan Cameron
<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:40:29 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This supersedes
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/12763087.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki/
> >
> > which was an update of
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6204724.lOV4Wx5bFT@rafael.j.wysocki/
> >
> > that superseded both
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/5049058.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki/
> >
> > and
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250919163147.4743-1-tiwai@suse.de/
> >
> > It follows the Jonathan's suggestion to use ACQUIRE()/ACQUIRE_ERR()
> > instead af raw CLASS() to make the code somewhat cleaner.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Looks excellent to me.  I've already been pointing a few people at this
> in driver reviews, so I expect to see a lot of adoption in IIO (and elsewhere).
> That RPM_TRANSPARENT handling is particularly nice.
>
> With the tweaks you've already called out.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>

Thanks!

> Given timing, if this ends up as a next cycle thing please could we have
> an immutable branch?  If it is going to make the merge window then no need.

I'm actually going to push it for 6.18 during the second half of the
merge window.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ