[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250929155829.GF2695987@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:58:29 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@...gle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@...dia.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, William Tu <witu@...dia.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>, dmatlack@...gle.com,
zhuyifei@...gle.com, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, praan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/15] iommu/vt-d: Add live update freeze callback
On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 07:06:17PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> +static int intel_liveupdate_freeze(struct liveupdate_subsystem *handle, u64 *data)
> +{
> + struct iommu_ser *ser = __va(*data);
> +
> + ser->iommu_units_phys = __pa(ser->iommu_units);
> + ser->devices_phys = __pa(ser->devices);
Why didn't this happen at an earlier stage? It makes no sense to some
hacky naked __pa
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists