[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNn5lPYQTPCZ1hPW@dragon>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 11:14:28 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] cpufreq: Make drivers using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL
specify transition latency
On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 12:00:22PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > > @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
> > > */
> > >
> > > #define CPUFREQ_ETERNAL (-1)
> > > +
> > > +#define CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TANSITION_LATENCY_NS NSEC_PER_MSEC
> >
> > Typo of TANSITION, should be CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS.
>
> Yes, thanks!
>
> Fixed already because CIs caught it yesterday.
With it fixed:
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> # with cpufreq-dt driver
BTW, a heads-up: the patch won't apply to 6.12 stable kernel directly.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists