[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250930163732.GP2695987@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:37:32 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <tatashin@...gle.com>,
Jason Miu <jasonmiu@...gle.com>, Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@...dia.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, William Tu <witu@...dia.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI/LUO: Save and restore driver name
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 09:02:44AM -0400, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> The kernel's PCI core would perform an extra check before falling back
> to the standard PCI ID matching.
This still seems very complex just to solve the VFIO case.
As I said, I would punt all of this to the initrd and let the initrd
explicitly bind drivers.
The only behavior we need from the kernel is to not autobind some
drivers so userspace can control it, and in a LUO type environment
userspace should well know what drivers go where - or can get it from
a preceeding kernel from a memfd.
This is broadly the same thing we need for Confidential Compute anyhow.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists