[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNwjzC1mlnHwEgsd@x1.local>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:39:08 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@...zon.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Ujwal Kundur <ujwal.kundur@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: Introduce vm_uffd_ops API
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 12:18:37PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.09.25 12:07, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:36:53AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 26.09.25 23:16, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > + /**
> > > > + * uffd_get_folio: Handler to resolve UFFDIO_CONTINUE request.
> > >
> > > Just wondering if we could incorporate the "continue" / "minor" aspect into
> > > the callback name.
> > >
> > > uffd_minor_get_folio / uffd_continue_get_folio
> > >
> > > Or do you see use of that callback in the context of other uffd features?
> >
> > If someone picks the gauntlet of refactoring the loop in mcopy_atomic()
> > we'd need a similar callback for uffd copy. And as I see it it would be
> > different enough to warrant emphasizing minor/continue in the name here.
Sure, I can go with uffd_minor_get_folio when I repost.
> >
> > I also think we can drop uffd_ prefix for the callback, as it's called as
> > uffd_ops->get_folio() or whatever it's be called.
>
> Agreed. I got annoyed yesterday when typing vma->vm_mm often enough
> (vma->mm! ).
That's also why I kept uffd_ because that's the tradition mm/ uses in many
important data structures like vma and mm. It helps most tagging systems
that most Linux developers use to avoid global name collisions.
So I tend to keep the prefix for now, until we want to switch away from
Hungarian-like notations completely. But let me know if anyone has strong
feelings.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists