linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvhoeNWOsYMvWRh+BA5dKDkoSRRGBuw5aeFTRzR_ofCvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 00:57:27 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, 
	achill@...ill.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Ben Copeland <benjamin.copeland@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/122] 5.10.245-rc1 review

On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 20:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.245 release.
> There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:37:59 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.245-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

The following LTP syscalls failed on stable-rc 5.10.
Noticed on both 5.10.243-rc1 and 5.10.245-rc1

First seen on 5.10.243-rc1.

 ltp-syscalls
  - fanotify13
  - fanotify14
  - fanotify15
  - fanotify16
  - fanotify21
  - landlock04
  - ioctl_ficlone02

Test regression: LTP syscalls fanotify13/14/15/16/21 TBROK: mkfs.vfat
failed with exit code 1

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

We are investigating and running bisections.

### Test log
tst_test.c:1888: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
tst_test.c:1217: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
mkfs.vfat: Partitions or virtual mappings on device '/dev/loop0', not
making filesystem (use -I to override)
tst_test.c:1217: TBROK: mkfs.vfat failed with exit code 1
HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c285a2f01d69
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bc2473c90fca
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c45beebfde34a
Summary:
passed   72
failed   0
broken   1
skipped  0
warnings 0
<8>[  868.434017] <LAVA_SIGNAL_ENDTC fanotify13>

## Build logs
 * Test details:
https://regressions.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/v5.10.244-123-g9abf794d1d5c/ltp-syscalls/fanotify13/
 * Test log:  https://qa-reports.linaro.org/api/testruns/30062041/log_file/

--
Linaro LKFT