linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] PM: Support aborting sleep during filesystem sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG2KctrK0JrP7JNUyzF72JeDgR4-GSRmJDe+yEnav=gQCAf64Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 15:37:17 -0700
From: Samuel Wu <wusamuel@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, 
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PM: Support aborting sleep during filesystem sync

On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:51 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:30 PM Samuel Wu <wusamuel@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Just a friendly ping on this patch. Please let me know if there's any
> > feedback or if you'd like me to make any changes.
>
> Have you seen https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250909065836.32534-1-tuhaowen@uniontech.com/
> ?
>
> If so, what do you think about it?

I was following this chain
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250908024655.14636-1-tuhaowen@uniontech.com/),
where there is some ongoing discussion on converging the solution.

Our changes aren't mutually exclusive, and tuhaowen can build changes
on top of ours, even indicating:
> I'm happy to work on this as a follow-up patch series after your changes land, or we could explore a unified solution that handles both scenarios.

These patchsets don't negate each other, so could we decouple these
two patchsets since they address different issues?

Thanks,
Sam
>
> If not, please see it.
>
> Thanks!