[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <876c01d5-0b32-4be0-92c7-acfdbf96767b@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 21:04:42 -0700
From: "Koralahalli Channabasappa, Smita" <skoralah@....com>
To: "Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
"linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev" <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Matthew Wilcox
<willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Li Ming <ming.li@...omail.com>,
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>,
Ying Huang <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
"Xingtao Yao (Fujitsu)" <yaoxt.fnst@...itsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@....com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
Benjamin Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>,
PradeepVineshReddy Kodamati <PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Tighten dependencies on DEV_DAX_CXL
and dax_hmem
On 8/31/2025 8:28 PM, Zhijian Li (Fujitsu) wrote:
>
>
> On 22/08/2025 11:41, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
>> Update Kconfig and runtime checks to better coordinate dax_cxl and dax_hmem
>> registration.
>>
>> Add explicit Kconfig ordering so that CXL_ACPI and CXL_PCI must be
>> initialized before DEV_DAX_HMEM.
>
> Is this dependency statement fully accurate? To clarify, another prerequisite for
> this ordering to work correctly is that dax_hmem must explicitly call
> `request_module("cxl_acpi")` and `request_module("cxl_pci")` during its initialization.
>
> Therefore, I recommend consolidating the following patches into a single commit
> to ensure atomic handling of the initialization order:
> - [PATCH 2/6] dax/hmem: Request cxl_acpi and cxl_pci before walking Soft Reserved ranges
> - [PATCH 3/6] dax/hmem, cxl: Tighten dependencies on DEV_DAX_CXL and dax_hmem
>
> Thanks
> Zhijian
I have merged 2/6 and 3/6 in v2.
Thanks
Smita
>> This prevents dax_hmem from consuming
>> Soft Reserved ranges before CXL drivers have had a chance to claim them.
>>
>> Replace IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CXL_REGION) with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_CXL)
>> so the code more precisely reflects when CXL-specific DAX coordination is
>> expected.
>>
>> This ensures that ownership of Soft Reserved ranges is consistently
>> handed off to the CXL stack when DEV_DAX_CXL is configured.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists