[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <026a2673-8195-4927-8cde-f7517b601125@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:31:50 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Cc: peterx@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
baohua@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, dev.jain@....com,
npache@...hat.com, riel@...riel.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, harry.yoo@...cle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
matthew.brost@...el.com, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, rakie.kim@...com,
byungchul@...com, gourry@...rry.net, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
apopple@...dia.com, usamaarif642@...il.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, ioworker0@...il.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when
remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage
On 30.09.25 08:05, Lance Yang wrote:
> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
>
> When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the shared
> zeropage, try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage() currently drops several important
> PTE bits.
>
> For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for
> incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are
> missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore.
>
> As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped.
> This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes
> to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data
> corruption.
>
> Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when
> creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration (per Dev)
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250930043351.34927-1-lance.yang@linux.dev/
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Avoid calling ptep_get() multiple times (per Dev)
> - Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David)
> - Collect Acked-by from David - thanks!
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1-lance.yang@linux.dev/
>
> mm/migrate.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index ce83c2c3c287..bafd8cb3bebe 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio, struct list_head *list)
>
> static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
> struct folio *folio,
> + pte_t old_pte,
> unsigned long idx)
Nit:
static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
struct folio *folio, pte_t old_pte, unsigned long idx)
LGTM, Thanks!
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists