[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ad95cd2-3a09-4873-b6c4-1e00a88dceb7@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:51:23 +0800
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: peterx@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
baohua@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, dev.jain@....com,
npache@...hat.com, riel@...riel.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, harry.yoo@...cle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
matthew.brost@...el.com, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, rakie.kim@...com,
byungchul@...com, gourry@...rry.net, ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
apopple@...dia.com, usamaarif642@...il.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, ioworker0@...il.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] mm/rmap: fix soft-dirty and uffd-wp bit loss when
remapping zero-filled mTHP subpage to shared zeropage
On 2025/9/30 14:31, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.09.25 08:05, Lance Yang wrote:
>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
>>
>> When splitting an mTHP and replacing a zero-filled subpage with the
>> shared
>> zeropage, try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage() currently drops several
>> important
>> PTE bits.
>>
>> For userspace tools like CRIU, which rely on the soft-dirty mechanism for
>> incremental snapshots, losing the soft-dirty bit means modified pages are
>> missed, leading to inconsistent memory state after restore.
>>
>> As pointed out by David, the more critical uffd-wp bit is also dropped.
>> This breaks the userfaultfd write-protection mechanism, causing writes
>> to be silently missed by monitoring applications, which can lead to data
>> corruption.
>>
>> Preserve both the soft-dirty and uffd-wp bits from the old PTE when
>> creating the new zeropage mapping to ensure they are correctly tracked.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>> Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage
>> when splitting isolated thp")
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - ptep_get() gets called only once per iteration (per Dev)
>> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250930043351.34927-1-
>> lance.yang@...ux.dev/
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - Avoid calling ptep_get() multiple times (per Dev)
>> - Double-check the uffd-wp bit (per David)
>> - Collect Acked-by from David - thanks!
>> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250928044855.76359-1-
>> lance.yang@...ux.dev/
>>
>> mm/migrate.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index ce83c2c3c287..bafd8cb3bebe 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ bool isolate_folio_to_list(struct folio *folio,
>> struct list_head *list)
>> static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct
>> page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
>> struct folio *folio,
>> + pte_t old_pte,
>> unsigned long idx)
>
> Nit:
>
> static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk
> *pvmw,
> struct folio *folio, pte_t old_pte, unsigned long idx)
Well, let me clean that up ;p
>
> LGTM, Thanks!
Cheers!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists