[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZbwuf2Fgtq+jyqzqspb37-P6X4O9xqkG-mSb+afSjh3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:09:27 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Franz-Josef Haider <fj.haider@...look.com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, ardb@...nel.org, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
ebiggers@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, kees@...nel.org,
dave@...ilevsky.ca, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Make sure CPU_ARM940T kernel can be built.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:33 PM Franz-Josef Haider
<fj.haider@...look.com> wrote:
> From 33ce5a26ef08199625bc5bb01a176047bfacff91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Franz-Josef Haider <fj.haider@...look.com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 22:14:07 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Make sure CPU_ARM940T kernel can be built.
>
> Fixes build for this cpu type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Franz-Josef Haider <fj.haider@...look.com>
Please elaborate a bit on this change in the commit message.
1. What were you trying to do.
2. What stopped you from doing what you wanted to do.
3. Why did you do this change to the kernel to do what you wanted
to do.
Should it not be:
!CPU_ARM740T && !CPU_ARM946E && !CPU_ARM940T
?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists