linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: ASI direct map management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eajnyirurulezkgpqaonfqmh5ydi7ujzztgok2ab3fsumcmtwi@34ios2bpwxk5>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 20:22:41 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, 
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, 
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, 
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>, Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, peterz@...radead.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, 
	mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, 
	derkling@...gle.com, junaids@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, reijiw@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org, 
	vbabka@...e.cz, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] mm: ASI direct map management

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:54:42PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/24/25 07:59, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> > As per [0] I think ASI is ready to start merging. This is the first
> > step. The scope of this series is: everything needed to set up the
> > direct map in the restricted address spaces.
> 
> Brendan!
> 
> Generally, we ask that patches get review tags before we consider them
> for being merged. Is there a reason this series doesn't need reviews
> before it gets merged?

I think Brendan just meant that this is not an RFC aimed at prompting
discussion anymore, these are fully functional patches aimed at being
merged after they are reviewed and iterated on accordingly.