lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5aaff54-04dd-4631-847c-a2e9bd5ad038@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 09:25:07 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
 Jernej Skrabec <jernej@...nel.org>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
 Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/2] net: stmmac: Add support for Allwinner
 A523 GMAC200

On 10/1/25 2:20 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 18:08:04 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 03:15:59 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> The Allwinner A523 SoC family has a second Ethernet controller, called
>>> the GMAC200 in the BSP and T527 datasheet, and referred to as GMAC1 for
>>> numbering. This controller, according to BSP sources, is fully
>>> compatible with a slightly newer version of the Synopsys DWMAC core.
>>> The glue layer around the controller is the same as found around older
>>> DWMAC cores on Allwinner SoCs. The only slight difference is that since
>>> this is the second controller on the SoC, the register for the clock
>>> delay controls is at a different offset. Last, the integration includes
>>> a dedicated clock gate for the memory bus and the whole thing is put in
>>> a separately controllable power domain.  
>>
>> Hi Andrew, does this look good ?
>>
>> thread: https://lore.kernel.org/20250925191600.3306595-3-wens@kernel.org
> 
> Adding Heiner and Russell, in case Andrew is AFK.
> 
> We need an ack from PHY maintainers, the patch seems to be setting
> delays regardless of the exact RMII mode. I don't know these things..

The net-next PR is upon us, let's defer even this series to the next cycle.

@Chen-Yu Tsai: please re-post it when net-next will reopen after Oct
12th, thanks!

Paolo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ