[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PH7PR16MB6196ADF912182709D465970DE5E6A@PH7PR16MB6196.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 10:06:56 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@...disk.com>
To: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>, "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>, "alim.akhtar@...sung.com"
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"can.guo@....qualcomm.com" <can.guo@....qualcomm.com>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, "beanhuo@...ron.com"
<beanhuo@...ron.com>, "jens.wiklander@...aro.org" <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add OP-TEE based RPMB driver for
UFS devices
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>
> This patch adds OP-TEE based RPMB support for UFS devices. This enables
> secure RPMB operations on UFS devices through OP-TEE, providing the same
> functionality available for eMMC devices and extending kernel-based secure
> storage support to UFS-based systems.
>
> Benefits of OP-TEE based RPMB implementation:
> - Eliminates dependency on userspace supplicant for RPMB access
> - Enables early boot secure storage access (e.g., fTPM, secure UEFI variables)
> - Provides kernel-level RPMB access as soon as UFS driver is initialized
> - Removes complex initramfs dependencies and boot ordering requirements
> - Ensures reliable and deterministic secure storage operations
> - Supports both built-in and modular fTPM configurations
>
> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <can.guo@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <can.guo@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@...disk.com>
Nit: Would it make sense to simplify things, e.g. :
Instead of struct list_head rpmbs;
Use:
struct ufs_rpmb_dev *rpmbs[4];
Also, I don't remember if you were planning to add the additional rpmb operations (6 to 9) later or not.
Thanks,
Avri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists