[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <okjvr65bw4u3ird44qfzuby2dptgn7bs74wsijq2jpj73ydlus@clx3fwq63nrt>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 14:26:30 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix inode leak caused by disconnected dentries
from exportfs
On Wed 01-10-25 15:13:10, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> When open_by_handle_at() is used with iso9660 filesystems, exportfs
> creates disconnected dentries during file handle resolution. If the
> operation fails (e.g., with -ESTALE during reconnect_path()), these
> dentries remain cached with their associated inodes.
>
> During unmount, shrink_dcache_for_umount() does not fully evict these
> disconnected dentries, leaving their inodes with non-zero reference
> counts. This triggers the "VFS: Busy inodes after unmount" warning
> and causes inode leaks that accumulate across mount/unmount cycles.
>
> The issue occurs because:
> 1. open_by_handle_at() calls exportfs_decode_fh_raw() to resolve
> file handles
> 2. For iso9660 with Joliet extensions, this creates disconnected
> dentries for both primary (iso9660) and secondary (Joliet) root
> inodes
> 3. When path reconnection fails with -ESTALE, the dentries are left
> in DCACHE_DISCONNECTED state
True, but when reconnection fails, exportfs_decode_fh_raw() calls dput() on
the created dentry and dput() immediately destroys DCACHE_DISCONNECTED
dentries. So I'm not following how these dentries could still survive until
umount(). Can you please explain?
> 4. shrink_dcache_for_umount() in generic_shutdown_super() does not
> aggressively evict these disconnected dentries
> 5. The associated inodes (typically root inodes 1792 and 1807)
> remain with i_count=1, triggering the busy inode check
>
> Add explicit shrink_dcache_sb() call in isofs_put_super() to ensure
> all cached dentries, including disconnected ones created by exportfs
> operations, are released before the superblock is destroyed.
This is almost certainly a wrong way of fixing the problem. First we need
to better understand why DCACHE_DISCONNECTED aren't getting properly
evicted...
Honza
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+1d79ebe5383fc016cf07@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/isofs/inode.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/isofs/inode.c b/fs/isofs/inode.c
> index 6f0e6b19383c..bee410705442 100644
> --- a/fs/isofs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/isofs/inode.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static int isofs_dentry_cmp_ms(const struct dentry *dentry,
> static void isofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct isofs_sb_info *sbi = ISOFS_SB(sb);
> + shrink_dcache_sb(sb);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_JOLIET
> unload_nls(sbi->s_nls_iocharset);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists