lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025100103-helpline-finishing-055f@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:07:59 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: cve@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CVE-2023-53502: xen/netback: Fix buffer overrun triggered by
 unusual packet

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 02:05:47PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 01.10.25 13:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Description
> > ===========
> > 
> > In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
> > 
> > xen/netback: Fix buffer overrun triggered by unusual packet
> > 
> > It is possible that a guest can send a packet that contains a head + 18
> > slots and yet has a len <= XEN_NETBACK_TX_COPY_LEN. This causes nr_slots
> > to underflow in xenvif_get_requests() which then causes the subsequent
> > loop's termination condition to be wrong, causing a buffer overrun of
> > queue->tx_map_ops.
> > 
> > Rework the code to account for the extra frag_overflow slots.
> > 
> > This is CVE-2023-34319 / XSA-432.
> > 
> > The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2023-53502 to this issue.
> 
> As can be seen right above your line "The Linux kernel CVE team ..."
> this issue has been handled by the Xen security team already and a
> CVE is assigned since then.

Ugh, then why doesn't that CVE reference this commit properly?  I do
sweep all old CVE assignments when doing this old-rereview.  Any chance
you can go and update these CVE entries with the proper git ids?

> Please revoke your CVE assignment.

Will go do so now, thanks for catching this.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ