linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 3/9] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: add buffer support in iio devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <FR2PPF4571F02BC2026559022A8291EC5DD8CE6A@FR2PPF4571F02BC.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:07:40 +0000
From: Remi Buisson <Remi.Buisson@....com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Remi Buisson via B4 Relay
	<devnull+remi.buisson.tdk.com@...nel.org>
CC: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
        Nuno Sá
	<nuno.sa@...log.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/9] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: add buffer support in iio
 devices

>
>
>From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> 
>Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2025 10:45 AM
>To: Remi Buisson via B4 Relay <devnull+remi.buisson.tdk.com@...nel.org>
>Cc: Remi Buisson <Remi.Buisson@....com>; David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>; Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>; Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>; Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-iio@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] iio: imu: inv_icm45600: add buffer support in iio devices
>
>On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:23:56 +0000
>Remi Buisson via B4 Relay <devnull+remi.buisson.tdk.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Remi Buisson <remi.buisson@....com>
>> 
>> Add FIFO control functions.
>> Support hwfifo watermark by multiplexing gyro and accel settings.
>> Support hwfifo flush.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Remi Buisson <remi.buisson@....com>
>Hi Remi,
>
>A few trivial things in here as well.
>
>Jonathan
Thanks again for the review !
Remi
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600.h
>> index 5f637e2f2ec8f1537459459dbb7e8a796d0ef7a6..aac8cd852c12cfba5331f2b7c1ffbbb2ed23d1c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600.h
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>  #define INV_ICM45600_H_
>>  
>>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>> +#include <linux/limits.h>
>
>Why this in the header?  Should be only needed in some of the c files I think
>so push the include down there.
This is because the below line uses U8_MAX:
#define INV_ICM45600_SENSOR_CONF_KEEP_VALUES { U8_MAX, U8_MAX, U8_MAX, U8_MAX }
So I guess the header from where it comes from should be included.
Please correct if I miss something.
>
...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.h b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c8caa8287dd4373cf11bb6c7b913a6c49e9eee5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/inv_icm45600_buffer.h
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct inv_icm45600_fifo - FIFO state variables
>> + * @on:		reference counter for FIFO on.
>> + * @en:		bits field of INV_ICM45600_SENSOR_* for FIFO EN bits.
>> + * @period:	FIFO internal period.
>> + * @watermark:	watermark configuration values for accel and gyro.
>Given the contents of this to me look like things to also document.e
> * @watermark.gyro:	....
>etc as well would be good to add
>
>> + * @count:	number of bytes in the FIFO data buffer.
>> + * @nb:		gyro, accel and total samples in the FIFO data buffer.
>
>This is more obvious.  Check if the kernel-doc script minds these subfields not
>being defined.  If it does, add a the trivial documentation just to squash warnings
>and make it easier to spot real issues.

With my setup "./scripts/kernel-doc.py -v -none drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm45600/*" does not catch anything, even with -Wall.
I'll detail the gyro/accel watermark comment anyway.