[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE3SzaSAowNnKKeitkEh7s0ZkZtTLwmth9g6=9wSh+HSgUFvyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 00:30:12 +0530
From: Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: dan@...obertson.com, dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
andy@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: accel: bma400: Refactor generic interrupt configuration
On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 3:14 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Akshay,
> I appreciate I replied probably after you sent this, but the request
> to split the renames out as a precursor that Nuno made is still valid.
> They add noise to the patch and make it harder to review.
>
> In general I'd like to see this broken into several steps/patches.
>
> I've mentioned some things to break out inline but it'll be something like
> * Field renames.
> * Documentation and explicit field definitions for initial values.
> * activity_event_en() rename
> * Change in how register addresses are obtained.
> * White space changes if you want to make them.
> Ordering is largely up to you to figure out.
>
> So I think at least 4 separate patches doing much smaller things.
> That should make it much easier to see what is going on in each.
>
> Various specific comments inline.
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for your valuable feedback on the patch.
Have floated a v3. As you suggested above, it is a patch series consisting
of 5 logically separable changes. Also addressed your comments mentioned
inline.
Thanks,
Akshay.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists