linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] CMDLINE: x86: convert to generic builtin command line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aN7n_5oiPjk-dCyJ@goliath>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 21:00:48 +0000
From: "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@...co.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Christophe Leroy
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Daniel
 Gimpelevich <daniel@...pelevich.san-francisco.ca.us>, Andrew Morton
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Pratyush Brahma <quic_pbrahma@...cinc.com>,
	Tomas Mudrunka <tomas.mudrunka@...il.com>, Sean Anderson
	<sean.anderson@...o.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Thomas
 Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav
 Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter
 Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "xe-linux-external(mailer list)"
	<xe-linux-external@...co.com>, Ruslan Ruslichenko <rruslich@...co.com>,
	Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] CMDLINE: x86: convert to generic builtin command line

On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 01:49:39PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/9/23 17:38, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig        | 44 +----------------------------------------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 18 ++---------------
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> 
> It would be really nice if you managed to get this rebased on current
> upstream and sent out again. I'd certainly ack the x86 bits if the
> Kconfig issue that 0day found was fixed up.
> 
> Also, one nit on the cover letter:
> 
> > There are a number of people who have expressed interest in these
> > patches either by asking for them to be merge or testing them. If
> > people are so inclined please continue to request them to be merge
> > or to ask the status of the next release. It's helpful to motivate me to
> > release them again and for the maintainers to see the interest
> > generated.
> 
> The way I'd suggest going about getting this merged is to solicit
> reviews and testing from folks and then get those annotations into the
> patches. As it stands, this series has zero tags in addition to the SoB
> tags which I assume were its authors.

How does one go about soliciting reviews from your perspective ? Typically I
just submit it in this fashion and whoever is interested reviews it.

Daniel