[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPe7Hn0qwg8jDMg4KoF-n4kziLQnvAx9vbNKEcS_KjzEdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 15:39:57 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com>
Cc: jesper.nilsson@...s.com, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, tomasz.figa@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, ksk4725@...sia.com, kenkim@...sia.com,
pjsin865@...sia.com, gwk1013@...sia.com, hgkim05@...sia.com,
mingyoungbo@...sia.com, smn1196@...sia.com, shradha.t@...sung.com,
inbaraj.e@...sung.com, swathi.ks@...sung.com, hrishikesh.d@...sung.com,
dj76.yang@...sung.com, hypmean.kim@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...s.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for the Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC
On Mon, 1 Sept 2025 at 14:42, Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Add basic support for the Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC which contains
> quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU and other several IPs. This SoC is an
> Axis-designed chipset used in surveillance camera products such as
> the AXIS Q1656-LE and AXIS Q3538-LVE.
>
> This ARTPEC-8 SoC has a variety of Samsung-specific IP blocks and
> Axis-specific IP blocks and SoC is manufactured by Samsung Foundry.
>
> List of Samsung-provided IPs:
> - UART
> - Ethernet (Vendor: Synopsys)
> - SDIO
> - SPI
> - HSI2C
> - I2S
> - CMU (Clock Management Unit)
> - Pinctrl (GPIO)
> - PCIe (Vendor: Synopsys)
> - USB (Vendor: Synopsys)
>
> List of Axis-provided IPs:
> - VIP (Image Sensor Processing IP)
> - VPP (Video Post Processing)
> - GPU
> - CDC (Video Encoder)
>
> This patch series includes below changes:
> - CMU (Clock Management Unit) driver and its bindings
> - GPIO pinctrl configuration and its bindings
> - Basic Device Tree for ARTPEC-8 SoC and boards
>
Pretty useless cover letter since it doesn't say the damn most
important thing : dependency!
So this went unnoticed and now mainline (Linus tree) is affected. See
Linus rant on soc pull request
I'm very disappointed, actually mostly on me that I picked this up.
Your future patches, need to improve quality and probably you need to
go back to how Git works and how maintainer trees are organized. Read
carefully, really carefully please maintainer profile .
I'll be putting artpec 9 on hold, till you confirm what was wrong here
and how are you going to fix it in the future.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists