linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rust: bindings: add `rust_helper_wait_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72ngvZSL72GQ+CwFoaE4ZfakZSPcZk1zrXqyaKEZLWDf-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 12:39:44 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Guangbo Cui <2407018371@...com>
Cc: byungchul@...com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, amir73il@...il.com, 
	andi.shyti@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, 
	bsegall@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, 
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, link@...o.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	mark.rutland@....com, masahiroy@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, 
	matthew.brost@...el.com, max.byungchul.park@...il.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, 
	melissa.srw@...il.com, mgorman@...e.de, mhocko@...nel.org, minchan@...nel.org, 
	oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...nel.org, penberg@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, 
	petr.pavlu@...e.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, will@...nel.org, yeoreum.yun@....com, 
	ysk@...lloc.com, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, 
	gary@...yguo.net, lossin@...nel.org, a.hindborg@...nel.org, 
	aliceryhl@...gle.com, dakr@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, 
	bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: bindings: add `rust_helper_wait_for_completion`
 helper function

On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 12:12 PM Guangbo Cui <2407018371@...com> wrote:
>
> The DEPT patch series changed `wait_for_completion` into a macro.

Thanks!

In general, it is useful to provide a Link: to Lore to the right patch
(i.e. context is good), and please clarify in which tree you found the
issue if any -- I don't see it in linux-next, so I imagine it is not
applied, but "changed" sounds like it was? If it was actually applied,
please also provide a Fixes: tag.

Cheers,
Miguel