[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77c1e6213e1c250ad8bf57849d8c90dfd2f105d1.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 13:42:24 +0200
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rv: Fully convert enabled_monitors to use list_head
as iterator
On Thu, 2025-10-02 at 08:22 +0000, Nam Cao wrote:
> The callbacks in enabled_monitors_seq_ops are inconsistent. Some treat the
> iterator as struct rv_monitor *, while others treat the iterator as struct
> list_head *.
>
> This causes a wrong type cast and crashes the system as reported by Nathan.
>
> Convert everything to use struct list_head * as iterator. This also makes
> enabled_monitors consistent with available_monitors.
>
Looks good to me and passes my tests.
Reviewed-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Gabriele
> Fixes: de090d1ccae1 ("rv: Fix wrong type cast in enabled_monitors_next()")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20250923002004.GA2836051@ax162/
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/rv/rv.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c b/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c
> index 48338520376f..43e9ea473cda 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static void *enabled_monitors_next(struct seq_file *m,
> void *p, loff_t *pos)
>
> list_for_each_entry_continue(mon, &rv_monitors_list, list) {
> if (mon->enabled)
> - return mon;
> + return &mon->list;
> }
>
> return NULL;
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static void *enabled_monitors_next(struct seq_file *m,
> void *p, loff_t *pos)
>
> static void *enabled_monitors_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> {
> - struct rv_monitor *mon;
> + struct list_head *head;
> loff_t l;
>
> mutex_lock(&rv_interface_lock);
> @@ -517,15 +517,15 @@ static void *enabled_monitors_start(struct seq_file *m,
> loff_t *pos)
> if (list_empty(&rv_monitors_list))
> return NULL;
>
> - mon = list_entry(&rv_monitors_list, struct rv_monitor, list);
> + head = &rv_monitors_list;
>
> for (l = 0; l <= *pos; ) {
> - mon = enabled_monitors_next(m, mon, &l);
> - if (!mon)
> + head = enabled_monitors_next(m, head, &l);
> + if (!head)
> break;
> }
>
> - return mon;
> + return head;
> }
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists