[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68dea12c352c0_1fa210071@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:58:36 -0700
From: <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
<baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>,
<aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <aik@....com>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI/IDE: Add Address Association Register setup for
RP
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
[..]
> > > @@ -206,6 +210,24 @@ struct pci_ide *pci_ide_stream_alloc(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > else
> > > rid_end = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> > >
> > > + br = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
> > > + if (!br)
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > + res = &br->resource[PCI_BRIDGE_MEM_WINDOW];
> > > + if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> >
> > Per Ilpo this can now just be a size check.
>
> I don't know why you said this about size as you implemented it below
> correctly using res->parent check (inside resource_assigned()).
Oh, stale comment. I wrote this, then read your suggestion about
resource_assigned(), updated the proposed patch, but failed to come back
and adjust this stale comment.
Sorry for the confusion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists