[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b1eb94db3c0e43f935930fccae5726dc381ff9e.camel@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 13:20:00 -0300
From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel@...cstar.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Petr Mladek
<pmladek@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, John Ogness
<john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>, Daniel Thompson
<danielt@...nel.org>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Handle NBCON consoles on KDB
githubOn Thu, 2025-10-02 at 15:01 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 02:21:06PM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza
> wrote:
> > In v5 only patch three was changed, changing the check for KDB CPU,
> > as suggested
> > by Petr Mladek. Also, it was based on the recent panic API [2],
> > which now sits on
> > -mm tree.
>
> Do you keep this work in a git tree anywhere? I wanted to point the
> kgdb
> test suite at it but the patches don't apply cleanly (even after I
> grabbed the patches mentioned in [2].
Yep... my mistake! I had rebased my patches on top on -mm tree just top
get those patches that I mentioned in [2], but then I rebased back to
master, which had some conflicts...
So, now I just pushed my changes on top on [2], which you can access
here[3]. I also included the revert of the code that converted 8250 to
NBCON, which is easier to test it using qemu, as I presented on the
cover-leter.
Thanks a lot for reviewing and testing the patchset!
[3]: https://github.com/marcosps/linux/tree/nbcon-kgdboc-v5
>
>
> Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists