linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_owner: Rename proc-prefixed variables for clarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a647617f-add7-499c-81c9-a5ed628e34f7@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 09:58:35 +0800
From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@...ux.dev>
To: Hu Song <husong@...inos.cn>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
 Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
 Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_owner: Rename proc-prefixed variables for
 clarity


在 2025/9/30 17:21, Hu Song 写道:
> From: Song Hu <husong@...inos.cn>
>
> The `proc_page_owner_operations` and related variables were renamed to
> `page_owner_fops` to better reflect their association with `debugfs` rather
> than `/proc`. This improves code clarity and aligns with kernel naming
> conventions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Hu <husong@...inos.cn>


Reviewed-by: Ye Liu <liuye@...inos.cn>

> ---
>  mm/page_owner.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
> index c3ca21132c2c..bb88b72b6062 100644
> --- a/mm/page_owner.c
> +++ b/mm/page_owner.c
> @@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static void init_early_allocated_pages(void)
>  		init_zones_in_node(pgdat);
>  }
>  
> -static const struct file_operations proc_page_owner_operations = {
> +static const struct file_operations page_owner_fops = {
>  	.read		= read_page_owner,
>  	.llseek		= lseek_page_owner,
>  };
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int page_owner_stack_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	return seq_open_private(file, &page_owner_stack_op, 0);
>  }
>  
> -static const struct file_operations page_owner_stack_operations = {
> +static const struct file_operations page_owner_stack_fops = {
>  	.open		= page_owner_stack_open,
>  	.read		= seq_read,
>  	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
> @@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ static int page_owner_threshold_set(void *data, u64 val)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(proc_page_owner_threshold, &page_owner_threshold_get,
> +DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(page_owner_threshold_fops, &page_owner_threshold_get,
>  			&page_owner_threshold_set, "%llu");
>  
>  
> @@ -961,13 +961,12 @@ static int __init pageowner_init(void)
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	debugfs_create_file("page_owner", 0400, NULL, NULL,
> -			    &proc_page_owner_operations);
> +	debugfs_create_file("page_owner", 0400, NULL, NULL, &page_owner_fops);
>  	dir = debugfs_create_dir("page_owner_stacks", NULL);
>  	debugfs_create_file("show_stacks", 0400, dir, NULL,
> -			    &page_owner_stack_operations);
> +			     &page_owner_stack_fops);
>  	debugfs_create_file("count_threshold", 0600, dir, NULL,
> -			    &proc_page_owner_threshold);
> +			    &page_owner_threshold_fops);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Thanks,
Ye Liu