linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] perf annotate: Skip annotating data types to lea instructions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aN9g2YfwZzBjyiOr@google.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 14:36:25 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Zecheng Li <zecheng@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Xu Liu <xliuprof@...gle.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] perf annotate: Skip annotating data types to
 lea instructions

Hello,

On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 07:57:59PM +0000, Zecheng Li wrote:
> Introduce a helper function is_address_gen_insn() to check
> arch-dependent address generation instructions like lea in x86. Remove
> type annotation on these instructions since they are not accessing
> memory. It should be counted as `no_mem_ops`.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zecheng Li <zecheng@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index c9b220d9f924..e2370b7fd599 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -2699,6 +2699,19 @@ static bool is_stack_canary(struct arch *arch, struct annotated_op_loc *loc)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * Returns true if the instruction has a memory operand without
> + * performing a load/store
> + */
> +static bool is_address_gen_insn(struct arch *arch, struct disasm_line *dl)
> +{
> +	if (arch__is(arch, "x86"))

Please put parentheses if the inner statement is placed on multiple
lines even if it's a single statement.

Otherwise, looks good to me.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +		if (!strncmp(dl->ins.name, "lea", 3))
> +			return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static struct disasm_line *
>  annotation__prev_asm_line(struct annotation *notes, struct disasm_line *curr)
>  {
> @@ -2807,6 +2820,12 @@ __hist_entry__get_data_type(struct hist_entry *he, struct arch *arch,
>  		return &stackop_type;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (is_address_gen_insn(arch, dl)) {
> +		istat->bad++;
> +		ann_data_stat.no_mem_ops++;
> +		return NO_TYPE;
> +	}
> +
>  	for_each_insn_op_loc(&loc, i, op_loc) {
>  		struct data_loc_info dloc = {
>  			.arch = arch,
> -- 
> 2.51.0.384.g4c02a37b29-goog
>