linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for the Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPft4eHTbA6qPA2MzyKZPhcxGUbJmfR3ykPaGuXRvacnEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 16:14:28 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com>
Cc: jesper.nilsson@...s.com, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, 
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	s.nawrocki@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, 
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, tomasz.figa@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, 
	will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, ksk4725@...sia.com, kenkim@...sia.com, 
	pjsin865@...sia.com, gwk1013@...sia.com, hgkim05@...sia.com, 
	mingyoungbo@...sia.com, smn1196@...sia.com, shradha.t@...sung.com, 
	inbaraj.e@...sung.com, swathi.ks@...sung.com, hrishikesh.d@...sung.com, 
	dj76.yang@...sung.com, hypmean.kim@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...s.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for the Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC

On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 14:45, Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> The dt-bindings patch was merged earlier in v3 series (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/175664688891.195158.13270877080433356384.b4-ty@linaro.org/ on 31st August)
> into respective maintainer repo.
> Then I have been asked to drop the applied v3 patches and send rebased v4 series (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/15508cb4-843c-42d1-8854-5eabd79ca0df@kernel.org/)
>
> Since the 4 patches from v3 series has been already merged, I have not the mentioned dependency while sending remaining v4 patches considering
> It is going to same maintainer repo and it will be applied in sequence.
>
> For future patches (like artpec-9), I will mention the dependency even it is merged in same repo.
>

I know what happened, so no need to explain that. Single maintainer
repo doesn't matter, it's irrelevant and you mentioning it means you
didn't read the maintainer soc profiles I asked. You still don't get
the problem about what happened, at least judging by above expansion,
and this means you will repeat the same mistakes.

I will not proceed with further artpec patches until you really
understand how the process works, through existing documentation.
Please do your homework, to reduce the workload on maintainers.