[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251003072909.GC12624@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 09:29:09 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/15] blktrace: add definitions for
blk_user_trace_setup2
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 05:02:23PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> +struct blk_user_trace_setup2 {
> + char name[32]; /* output */
Is 32 still a good size limit? Or would this be a time to
allow for more?
Otherwise this looks fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists