lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251003005103.2399934-1-kartikey406@gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  3 Oct 2025 06:21:03 +0530
From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
To: tytso@....edu
Cc: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: reject inline data flag when i_extra_isize is zero


Looking at the syzbot logs more carefully, I see the initial 'acceptance' was 
because the filesystem failed to mount ('VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem'), 
so the bug couldn't be triggered at all. My patches were never actually tested 
against the real bug.

I apologize for the confusion. I still cannot test locally to determine what 
the actual corruption scenario is. Today I have re-tested my same patch in 
syzbot and it is failing.

Best regards,
Deepanshu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ