[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ac08f9f-3f48-4178-9b59-b4c4f93966cf@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 16:27:12 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, "Maciej
Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman
<peternewman@...gle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger
<babu.moger@....com>, Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin
<Dave.Martin@....com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/31] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to
functions when reading events
Hi Tony,
On 9/25/25 1:03 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> Reading monitoring data from MMIO requires more context to be able to
To tie this together with the "instead of just the event id" used later
I'd propose:
Reading monitoring event data from MMIO requires more context
than the event id to be able to ...
> read the correct memory location. struct mon_evt is the appropriate
> place for this event specific context.
>
> Prepare for addition of extra fields to mon_evt by changing the calling
"mon_evt" -> "struct mon_evt"
> conventions to pass a pointer to the mon_evt structure instead of just
> the event id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
| Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists