lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OaiyHa1----9@tutamail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 13:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: craftfever@...amail.com
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Ntfs3 <ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
	Almaz Alexandrovich <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug] Memory allocation errors and system crashing due to
 buggy
 disk cache/inode allocations by ntfs3 kernel module.

I'm posting there first time, so I through it like generic bug mailing list, but I can say, that, for example, version 6.12.50-lts a little less pron to bug, but it occurs there as well. I'm using Linux 6.16.10 for now. So, bug is present a while, but i hardly to tell, in what kernel version it appeared, cause earlier, I didn't manage that big amount of files. Again, it's okay with ntfs-3g.

Oct 4, 2025, 14:12 by regressions@...mhuis.info:

>
>
> On 10/4/25 13:03, craftfever@...amail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Oct 4, 2025, 11:55 by craftfever@...amail.com:
>>
>>> I'm expecting serious bug when writing large amount of files to
>>> NTFS hard drive, shortly after memory allocation errors and system
>>> crash occurs/ Firstly, I thought, than this is bug in linux kernel
>>> itself, somewhat disk cache allocation error, but when I tested
>>> same operations on ext4 drive or using NTFS-3G module, bug is not
>>> present.
>>>
>> To reproduce a bug, try cloning two big Git repositories to an
>> external NTFS drive mounted with ntfs3 module.
>>
> Thx for the report.
>
> What kernel version are your using?
>
> You CCed the regression list, so I assume this used to work, which leads
> to two more questions: What was the last version where this works? Could
> you bisect?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ