linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.17 00/15] 6.17.1-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuW6+KiuVd+ONpyo-vWCvF=dSNJzc0cdarBXjNY_XGaAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 17:35:44 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, 
	achill@...ill.org, Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, 
	Juan Yescas <jyescas@...gle.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, 
	Ben Copeland <benjamin.copeland@...aro.org>, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>, 
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>, LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.17 00/15] 6.17.1-rc1 review

On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 21:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.17.1 release.
> There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 05 Oct 2025 16:02:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.17.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.17.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


LTP syscalls swapon01, swapon02, swapon03, swapoff01 and swapoff02 test failing
on 16K and 64K page arm64 devices and passed with default 4K page size.

These failures are noticed on Linux next and mainline master (v6.17).

This test failed on 16K page size builds and 64K page size builds.
 * CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y
 * CONFIG_ARM64_16K_PAGES=y

Test regression: LTP swapon/off 16K and 64K page size LTP
libswap.c:230: TFAIL: swapon() on fuse failed: EINVAL (22)

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Anders, bisected this on the Linux next and found the,
# first bad commit:
  [bd24d2108e9c8459d2c9f3d6d910b0053887df57]
  fuse: fix fuseblk i_blkbits for iomap partial writes

## Test logs
### swapon01

libswap.c:230: TFAIL: swapon() on fuse failed: EINVAL (22)
swapon01.c:39: TINFO: create a swapfile size of 128 megabytes (MB)
swapon01.c:25: TFAIL: tst_syscall(__NR_swapon, SWAP_FILE, 0) failed: EINVAL (22)

Lore link,
- https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYtnXeG6oVrq+5v70sE2W7Wws_zcc63VaXZjy1b1O1S-FQ@mail.gmail.com/

## Build
* kernel: 6.17.1-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: e7da5b86b53db5f0fb8e2a4e0936eab2e6491ec7
* git describe: v6.17-16-ge7da5b86b53d
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.17.y/build/v6.17-16-ge7da5b86b53d

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.17-16-ge7da5b86b53d)
* qemu-arm64, ltp-syscalls
  - swapoff01
  - swapoff02
  - swapon01
  - swapon02
  - swapon03

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.17-16-ge7da5b86b53d)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.17-16-ge7da5b86b53d)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.17-16-ge7da5b86b53d)

## Test result summary
total: 162823, pass: 136895, fail: 4815, skip: 21113, xfail: 0

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 138 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 51 passed, 6 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 39 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 24 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 22 total, 21 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 46 passed, 3 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-rust
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
* rt-tests-cyclicdeadline
* rt-tests-pi-stress
* rt-tests-pmqtest
* rt-tests-rt-migrate-test
* rt-tests-signaltest

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org