[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a36555b9-b2b4-41a3-bbf1-58701b9f4b1a@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2025 19:25:19 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
To: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
Amol Maheshwari <amahesh@....qualcomm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com, yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kumari Pallavi <kumari.pallavi@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] misc: fastrpc: Add support for new DSP IOVA
formatting
On 9/25/25 12:46 AM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> From: Kumari Pallavi <kumari.pallavi@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Implement the new IOVA formatting required by the DSP architecture change
> on Kaanapali SoC. Place the SID for DSP DMA transactions at bit 56 in the
> physical address. This placement is necessary for the DSPs to correctly
> identify streams and operate as intended.
> To address this, add an iova-format flag which determines the SID position
> within the physical address. Set SID position to bit 56 when iova_format
> is enabled; otherwise, default to legacy 32-bit placement.
> Initialize the flag to 0 and update to 1 based on SoC-specific compatible
> string from the root node.
> This change ensures consistent SID placement across DSPs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumari Pallavi <kumari.pallavi@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index 8e1d97873423..db396241b8ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
> #define FASTRPC_ALIGN 128
> #define FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST 16
> #define FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST 64
> -#define FASTRPC_PHYS(p) ((p) & 0xffffffff)
> #define FASTRPC_CTX_MAX (256)
> #define FASTRPC_INIT_HANDLE 1
> #define FASTRPC_DSP_UTILITIES_HANDLE 2
> @@ -105,6 +104,26 @@
>
> #define miscdev_to_fdevice(d) container_of(d, struct fastrpc_device, miscdev)
>
> +/*
> + * By default, the sid will be prepended adjacent to smmu pa before sending
> + * to DSP. But if the compatible Soc found at root node specifies the new
> + * addressing format to handle pa's of longer widths, then the sid will be
> + * prepended at the position specified in this macro.
> + */
> +#define SID_POS_IN_IOVA 56
> +
> +/* Default width of pa bus from dsp */
> +#define DSP_DEFAULT_BUS_WIDTH 32
I dont see any point in defining these both here, this should be part of
the fastrpc_soc_data and a fallback fastrpc_soc_data.
> +
> +/* Extract smmu pa from consolidated iova */
> +#define IOVA_TO_PHYS(iova, sid_pos) (iova & ((1ULL << sid_pos) - 1ULL))
> +
> +/*
> + * Prepare the consolidated iova to send to dsp by prepending the sid
> + * to smmu pa at the appropriate position
> + */
> +#define IOVA_FROM_SID_PA(sid, phys, sid_pos) (phys += sid << sid_pos)
> +
> struct fastrpc_phy_page {
> u64 addr; /* physical address */
> u64 size; /* size of contiguous region */
> @@ -255,6 +274,7 @@ struct fastrpc_session_ctx {
> int sid;
> bool used;
> bool valid;
> + u32 sid_pos;
Why is this in session context? are you expecting this to be different
for each session? move it to channel_ctx.
> };
>
> struct fastrpc_channel_ctx {
> @@ -278,6 +298,7 @@ struct fastrpc_channel_ctx {
> bool secure;
> bool unsigned_support;
> u64 dma_mask;
> + u32 iova_format;
Format is very much misleading, And this is totally redundant if you add
sid_pos to soc_data.
Please add soc_data struct here, so that we dont have to keep adding
members to this and it also makes it clear what are soc specific bits in
this.
> };
>
> struct fastrpc_device {
> @@ -391,8 +412,11 @@ static int fastrpc_map_lookup(struct fastrpc_user *fl, int fd,
>
> static void fastrpc_buf_free(struct fastrpc_buf *buf)
> {
> + uint32_t sid_pos = (buf->fl->sctx ? buf->fl->sctx->sid_pos :
> + DSP_DEFAULT_BUS_WIDTH);
Why this new check added?
> +
> dma_free_coherent(buf->dev, buf->size, buf->virt,
> - FASTRPC_PHYS(buf->phys));
> + IOVA_TO_PHYS(buf->phys, sid_pos));
> kfree(buf);
> }
>
> @@ -442,7 +466,7 @@ static int fastrpc_buf_alloc(struct fastrpc_user *fl, struct device *dev,
> buf = *obuf;
>
> if (fl->sctx && fl->sctx->sid)
> - buf->phys += ((u64)fl->sctx->sid << 32);
> + IOVA_FROM_SID_PA((u64)fl->sctx->sid, buf->phys, fl->sctx->sid_pos);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -687,7 +711,8 @@ static int fastrpc_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> ret = dma_get_sgtable(buffer->dev, &a->sgt, buffer->virt,
> - FASTRPC_PHYS(buffer->phys), buffer->size);
> + IOVA_TO_PHYS(buffer->phys, buffer->fl->sctx->sid_pos),
> + buffer->size);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(buffer->dev, "failed to get scatterlist from DMA API\n");
> kfree(a);
> @@ -736,7 +761,7 @@ static int fastrpc_mmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
>
> return dma_mmap_coherent(buf->dev, vma, buf->virt,
> - FASTRPC_PHYS(buf->phys), size);
> + IOVA_TO_PHYS(buf->phys, buf->fl->sctx->sid_pos), size);
> }
>
> static const struct dma_buf_ops fastrpc_dma_buf_ops = {
> @@ -793,7 +818,8 @@ static int fastrpc_map_create(struct fastrpc_user *fl, int fd,
> map->phys = sg_phys(map->table->sgl);
> } else {
> map->phys = sg_dma_address(map->table->sgl);
> - map->phys += ((u64)fl->sctx->sid << 32);
> + IOVA_FROM_SID_PA((u64)fl->sctx->sid, map->phys,
> + fl->sctx->sid_pos);
> }
> map->size = len;
> map->va = sg_virt(map->table->sgl);
> @@ -2153,11 +2179,14 @@ static int fastrpc_cb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sess->used = false;
> sess->valid = true;
> sess->dev = dev;
> - dev_set_drvdata(dev, sess);
> + /* Configure where sid will be prepended to pa */
unnessary comment here.
> + sess->sid_pos =
> + (cctx->iova_format ? SID_POS_IN_IOVA : DSP_DEFAULT_BUS_WIDTH);
as commented eariler, replace iova_format from soc_data with pos.
>
> if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "reg", &sess->sid))
> dev_info(dev, "FastRPC Session ID not specified in DT\n");
>
> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, sess);
why this line moved in this patch?
> if (sessions > 0) {
> struct fastrpc_session_ctx *dup_sess;
>
> @@ -2256,6 +2285,19 @@ static int fastrpc_get_domain_id(const char *domain)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +struct fastrpc_soc_data {
> + u32 dsp_iova_format;
s/dsp_iova_format/sid_pos
> +};
> +
> +static const struct fastrpc_soc_data kaanapali_soc_data = {
> + .dsp_iova_format = 1,
.sid_pos = 54,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_soc_match_table[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,kaanapali", .data = &kaanapali_soc_data },
> + {},
> +};
> +
> static int fastrpc_rpmsg_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> {
> struct device *rdev = &rpdev->dev;
> @@ -2264,6 +2306,23 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> const char *domain;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists