[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0pp455w.fsf@>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 19:41:47 +0200
From: Miquel Sabaté Solà <mssola@...ola.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Use a cleanup attribute in copy_fdtable()
Al Viro @ 2025-10-05 10:01 +01:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2025 at 07:37:50AM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
>> Al Viro @ 2025-10-04 22:19 +01:
>>
>> > On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 11:03:40PM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
>> >> This is a small cleanup in which by using the __free(kfree) cleanup
>> >> attribute we can avoid three labels to go to, and the code turns to be
>> >> more concise and easier to follow.
>> >
>> > Have you tried to build and boot that?
>>
>> Yes, and it worked on my machine...
>
> Unfortunately, it ends up calling that kfree() on success as well as on failure.
> Idiomatic way to avoid that would be
> return no_free_ptr(fdt);
> but you've left bare
> return fdt;
> in there, ending up with returning dangling pointers to the caller. So as
> soon as you get more than BITS_PER_LONG descriptors used by a process,
> you'll get trouble. In particular, bash(1) running as an interactive shell
> would hit that - it has descriptor 255 opened...
Ugh, this is just silly from my end...
You are absolutely right. I don't know what the hell I was doing while
testing that prevented me from realizing this before, but as you say
it's quite obvious and I was just blind or something.
Sorry for the noise and thanks for your patience...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (898 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists