lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWydvUtYUiT23HcgRA3+6di0sZmVqrAPMGM_v5B208=zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:22:01 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, 
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: uapi: Strip comments before size type check

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 12:31, Thomas Weißschuh
<thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 10:49:28AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On m68k, check_sizetypes in headers_check reports:
> >
> >     ./usr/include/asm/bootinfo-amiga.h:17: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > This header file does not use any of the Linux-specific integer types,
> > but merely refers to them from comments, so this is a false positive.
> > As of commit c3a9d74ee413bdb3 ("kbuild: uapi: upgrade check_sizetypes()
> > warning to error"), this check was promoted to an error, breaking m68k
> > all{mod,yes}config builds.
>
> This commit has been in -next for some time. Any idea why the issue did
> not show up there?

No idea. Looks like the build bots that are still running don't exercise m68k
builds on linux-next?
Perhaps this is just collateral damage of the loss of the kisskb build service?

> > Fix this by stripping simple comments before looking for Linux-specific
> > integer types.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>

Thanks!

>
> > ---
> >  usr/include/headers_check.pl | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/usr/include/headers_check.pl b/usr/include/headers_check.pl
> > index 21c2fb9520e6af2d..75dfdce39e7f4610 100755
> > --- a/usr/include/headers_check.pl
> > +++ b/usr/include/headers_check.pl
> > @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ sub check_sizetypes
> >       if (my $included = ($line =~ /^\s*#\s*include\s+[<"](\S+)[>"]/)[0]) {
> >               check_include_typesh($included);
> >       }
> > +     # strip comments (single-line and C99 only)
> > +     $line =~ s@\/\*.*?\*\/@@;
> > +     $line =~ s@\/\/.*$@@;
>
> C99/C++ comments are rejected in UAPI headers, so this line can be dropped.

'git grep "//" -- "*uapi*.h"' disagrees...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ