[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251006130542.3174-2-glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 15:05:42 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Young Xiao <YangX92@...mail.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>,
Sam James <sam@...too.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michael Karcher <kernel@...rcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] Revert "sunvdc: Do not spin in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN"
In a11f6ca9aef9 ("sunvdc: Do not spin in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send()
returns EAGAIN"), a maximum retry count was added to __vdc_tx_trigger().
After this change, several users reported disk I/O errors when running Linux
inside a logical domain on Solaris 11.4:
[19095.192532] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19095.192605] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 368208928 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 2 prio class 2
[19095.205681] XFS (vdiskc1): metadata I/O error in "xfs_buf_ioend+0x28c/0x600 [xfs]" at daddr 0x15f26420 len 32 error 5
[19432.043471] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.043529] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3732568 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
[19432.058821] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.058843] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3736256 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 4 prio class 2
[19432.074109] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.074128] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3736512 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 4 prio class 2
[19432.089425] sunvdc: vdc_tx_trigger() failure, err=-11
[19432.089443] I/O error, dev vdiskc, sector 3737024 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x1000 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
[19432.100964] XFS (vdiskc1): metadata I/O error in "xfs_buf_ioend+0x28c/0x600 [xfs]" at daddr 0x38ec58 len 8 error 5
Since this change seems to have only been justified by reading the code which
becomes evident by the reference to adddc32d6fde ("sunvnet: Do not spin in an
infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN") in the commit message, it
can be safely assumed that the change was neither properly tested nor motivated
by any actual bug reports.
Thus, let's revert this change to address the disk I/O errors above.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: a11f6ca9aef9 ("sunvdc: Do not spin in an infinite loop when vio_ldc_send() returns EAGAIN")
Signed-off-by: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
---
Changes since v1:
- Rephrase commit message
Changes since v2:
- Add missing CC and Fixes tags
---
drivers/block/sunvdc.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/sunvdc.c b/drivers/block/sunvdc.c
index 282f81616a78..f56023c2b033 100644
--- a/drivers/block/sunvdc.c
+++ b/drivers/block/sunvdc.c
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ MODULE_VERSION(DRV_MODULE_VERSION);
#define WAITING_FOR_GEN_CMD 0x04
#define WAITING_FOR_ANY -1
-#define VDC_MAX_RETRIES 10
-
static struct workqueue_struct *sunvdc_wq;
struct vdc_req_entry {
@@ -437,7 +435,6 @@ static int __vdc_tx_trigger(struct vdc_port *port)
.end_idx = dr->prod,
};
int err, delay;
- int retries = 0;
hdr.seq = dr->snd_nxt;
delay = 1;
@@ -450,8 +447,6 @@ static int __vdc_tx_trigger(struct vdc_port *port)
udelay(delay);
if ((delay <<= 1) > 128)
delay = 128;
- if (retries++ > VDC_MAX_RETRIES)
- break;
} while (err == -EAGAIN);
if (err == -ENOTCONN)
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists