lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fVHetc8DqdqxURJm_VtaH6apJKoyVOSpfQrE2ntkEa+4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 09:18:22 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@...el.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>, 
	Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, 
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Tengda Wu <wutengda@...weicloud.com>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf bpf_counter: Fix handling of cpumap fixing hybrid

On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 11:12 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Don't open evsels on all CPUs, open them just on the CPUs they
> support. This avoids opening say an e-core event on a p-core and
> getting a failure - achieve this by getting rid of the "all_cpu_map".
>
> In install_pe functions don't use the cpu_map_idx as a CPU number,
> translate the cpu_map_idx, which is a dense index into the cpu_map
> skipping holes at the beginning, to a proper CPU number.
>
> Before:
> ```
> $ perf stat --bpf-counters -a -e cycles,instructions -- sleep 1
>
>  Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
>    <not supported>      cpu_atom/cycles/
>        566,270,672      cpu_core/cycles/
>    <not supported>      cpu_atom/instructions/
>        572,792,836      cpu_core/instructions/           #    1.01  insn per cycle
>
>        1.001595384 seconds time elapsed
> ```
>
> After:
> ```
> $ perf stat --bpf-counters -a -e cycles,instructions -- sleep 1
>
>  Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
>        443,299,201      cpu_atom/cycles/
>      1,233,919,737      cpu_core/cycles/
>        213,634,112      cpu_atom/instructions/           #    0.48  insn per cycle
>      2,758,965,527      cpu_core/instructions/           #    2.24  insn per cycle
>
>        1.001699485 seconds time elapsed
> ```
>
> Fixes: 7fac83aaf2ee ("perf stat: Introduce 'bperf' to share hardware PMCs with BPF")
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

+Thomas Falcon

I think it'd be nice to get this quite major fix for
--bpf-counters/bperf for hybrid architectures into v6.18 and stable
builds. Thomas would it be possible for you to give a Tested-by tag
using the reproduction in the commit message?

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c        | 26 ++++++++++----------------
>  tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c |  3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
> index 1c6cb5ea077e..ca5d01b9017d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
> @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ static int bpf_program_profiler__install_pe(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu_map_idx
>  {
>         struct bpf_prog_profiler_bpf *skel;
>         struct bpf_counter *counter;
> +       int cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(evsel->core.cpus, cpu_map_idx).cpu;
>         int ret;
>
>         list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel->bpf_counter_list, list) {
> @@ -343,7 +344,7 @@ static int bpf_program_profiler__install_pe(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu_map_idx
>                 assert(skel != NULL);
>
>                 ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.events),
> -                                         &cpu_map_idx, &fd, BPF_ANY);
> +                                         &cpu, &fd, BPF_ANY);
>                 if (ret)
>                         return ret;
>         }
> @@ -451,7 +452,6 @@ static int bperf_check_target(struct evsel *evsel,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static struct perf_cpu_map *all_cpu_map;
>  static __u32 filter_entry_cnt;
>
>  static int bperf_reload_leader_program(struct evsel *evsel, int attr_map_fd,
> @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int bperf_reload_leader_program(struct evsel *evsel, int attr_map_fd,
>          * following evsel__open_per_cpu call
>          */
>         evsel->leader_skel = skel;
> -       evsel__open_per_cpu(evsel, all_cpu_map, -1);
> +       evsel__open(evsel, evsel->core.cpus, evsel->core.threads);
>
>  out:
>         bperf_leader_bpf__destroy(skel);
> @@ -533,12 +533,6 @@ static int bperf__load(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target)
>         if (bperf_check_target(evsel, target, &filter_type, &filter_entry_cnt))
>                 return -1;
>
> -       if (!all_cpu_map) {
> -               all_cpu_map = perf_cpu_map__new_online_cpus();
> -               if (!all_cpu_map)
> -                       return -1;
> -       }
> -
>         evsel->bperf_leader_prog_fd = -1;
>         evsel->bperf_leader_link_fd = -1;
>
> @@ -656,9 +650,10 @@ static int bperf__load(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target)
>  static int bperf__install_pe(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu_map_idx, int fd)
>  {
>         struct bperf_leader_bpf *skel = evsel->leader_skel;
> +       int cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(evsel->core.cpus, cpu_map_idx).cpu;
>
>         return bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.events),
> -                                  &cpu_map_idx, &fd, BPF_ANY);
> +                                  &cpu, &fd, BPF_ANY);
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -667,13 +662,12 @@ static int bperf__install_pe(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu_map_idx, int fd)
>   */
>  static int bperf_sync_counters(struct evsel *evsel)
>  {
> -       int num_cpu, i, cpu;
> +       struct perf_cpu cpu;
> +       int idx;
> +
> +       perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, idx, evsel->core.cpus)
> +               bperf_trigger_reading(evsel->bperf_leader_prog_fd, cpu.cpu);
>
> -       num_cpu = perf_cpu_map__nr(all_cpu_map);
> -       for (i = 0; i < num_cpu; i++) {
> -               cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(all_cpu_map, i).cpu;
> -               bperf_trigger_reading(evsel->bperf_leader_prog_fd, cpu);
> -       }
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
> index ed6a29b106b4..690be3ce3e11 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
> @@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__load(struct evsel *evsel,
>  }
>
>  static int bperf_cgrp__install_pe(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused,
> -                                 int cpu __maybe_unused, int fd __maybe_unused)
> +                                 int cpu_map_idx __maybe_unused,
> +                                 int fd __maybe_unused)
>  {
>         /* nothing to do */
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.51.0.618.g983fd99d29-goog
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ