lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjcXn+uPu8h554YFyZqfkoF=K4+tFFtXHsWNzqftShdbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 09:19:18 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, 
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, "nstange@...e.de" <nstange@...e.de>, 
	"Wang, Jay" <wanjay@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: 6.17 crashes in ipv6 code when booted fips=1 [was: [GIT PULL]
 Crypto Update for 6.17]

On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 04:53, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure the use of SHA-1/HMAC inside IPv6 segment routing counts
> as a "security function" (as it is used for message authentication) and
> thus should be subject to FIPS requirements when booting with fips=1.

I think the other way of writing that is "fips=1 is and will remain
irrelevant in the real world as long as it's that black-and-white".

             Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ