linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 04/20] nvdimm/label: Update mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <720167805.241759726505455.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1new>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 19:49:13 +0530
From: Neeraj Kumar <s.neeraj@...sung.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com,
	a.manzanares@...sung.com, vishak.g@...sung.com, neeraj.kernel@...il.com,
	cpgs@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 04/20] nvdimm/label: Update mutex_lock() with
 guard(mutex)()

On 24/09/25 02:42PM, Alison Schofield wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 07:11:00PM +0530, Neeraj Kumar wrote:
>> Updated mutex_lock() with guard(mutex)()
>
>Along with the other reviewer comments to limit the application
>of guard() to where it is most useful, can this be spun off
>as a single patch that would be done irregardless on the
>new label support?
>
>I'm asking the question. I don't know the answer ;)
>

This patch is independent and not related with this series.
Its good to send this seperately.


Regards,
Neeraj