[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aOP0KPfZYd11XoTq@agluck-desk3>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 09:54:00 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, Maciej Wieczor-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, "Drew
Fustini" <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Chen Yu
<yu.c.chen@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 31/31] fs/resctrl: Some kerneldoc updates
On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 05:26:45PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 9/25/25 1:03 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> > resctrl event monitoring on Sub-NUMA Cluster (SNC) systems sums the
> > counts for events across all nodes sharing an L3 cache.
> >
> > Update the kerneldoc for rmid_read::sum and the do_sum argument to
> > mon_get_kn_priv() to say these are only used on the RDT_RESOURCE_L3
> > resource.
>
> This is clear from the patch. Why is this needed as part of
> telemetry event enabling? Perhaps this can be combined with the
> unrelated SNC warnings found in "x86/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion
> for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG" to be a patch dedicated to addressing SNC
> topics related to telemetry events?
I will add an SNC cleanup patch to the series and make these changes there.
>
> >
> > Add Return: value description for l3_mon_domain_mbm_alloc(),
> > resctrl_l3_mon_resource_init(), and domain_setup_l3_mon_state()
>
> Appreciate the cleanups but please have series start with cleanups instead of end.
Can I bundle these cleanups with patch 8 that renames these functions?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> > ---
>
> Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists