lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251006224301.4dcf3878@pavilion>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 22:45:47 +0200
From: Thomas Wismer <thomas@...mer.xyz>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Thomas Wismer <thomas.wismer@....ch>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: pse-pd: tps23881: Fix current measurement
 scaling

Am Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:50:29 +0200
schrieb Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>:

> On Sat,  4 Oct 2025 20:03:49 +0200
> Thomas Wismer <thomas@...mer.xyz> wrote:
> 
> > From: Thomas Wismer <thomas.wismer@....ch>
> > 
> > The TPS23881 improves on the TPS23880 with current sense resistors
> > reduced from 255 mOhm to 200 mOhm. This has a direct impact on the
> > scaling of the current measurement. However, the latest TPS23881
> > data sheet from May 2023 still shows the scaling of the TPS23880
> > model.  
> 
> Didn't know that. Where did you get that new current step value if
> it's not from the datasheet?

The correct current measurement scaling can either be found in the
TPS23881B datasheet revised in May 2025 or computed from the legacy sense
resistor value (255 mOhm / 200 mOhm * 70.19 uA = 89.50 uA). I was able to
verify the corrected scaling using power measurement instruments.

> Also as the value reported was wrong maybe we need a fix tag here and
> send it to net instead of net-next.

Right. I'll resubmit this patch to net.

> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Wismer <thomas.wismer@....ch>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
> > b/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c index 63f8f43062bc..b724b222ab44
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/tps23881.c
> > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
> >  #define TPS23881_REG_SRAM_DATA	0x61
> >  
> >  #define TPS23881_UV_STEP	3662
> > -#define TPS23881_NA_STEP	70190
> > +#define TPS23881_NA_STEP	89500
> >  #define TPS23881_MW_STEP	500
> >  #define TPS23881_MIN_PI_PW_LIMIT_MW	2000
> >    
> 
> 
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ