[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025100612-disarray-hazily-a49b@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 08:34:27 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org, riel@...riel.com,
frederic@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz: avoid showing '(null)' if nohz_full= not set
On Sun, Oct 05, 2025 at 08:58:24PM -0400, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> In the context of CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y, tick_nohz_full_mask (of type
> cpumask_var_t) is initialised to 0. Memory is only allocated to the cpumask
> data structure, in tick_nohz_full_setup(), when Linux kernel boot-time
> parameter "nohz_full=" is correctly specified (see housekeeping_setup()).
> If "nohz_full=" is not set and an attempt is made to read
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/nohz_full, '(null)' can be displayed:
>
> ❯ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/nohz_full
> (null)
>
> This patch changes the output to print a newline (or 0x0A) instead of
> '(null)', making it consistent with print_cpus_isolated() behaviour.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/cpu.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index fa0a2eef93ac..f694b4b24d6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,9 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(isolated, 0444, print_cpus_isolated, NULL);
> static ssize_t print_cpus_nohz_full(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(tick_nohz_full_mask));
> + return !tick_nohz_full_mask ?
> + sysfs_emit(buf, "\n") :
> + sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(tick_nohz_full_mask));
Please write out the if statement please.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists