linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add Device tree parsing logic for DLL settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251006214432.GA625548-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 16:44:32 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Ram Prakash Gupta <quic_rampraka@...cinc.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com,
	quic_pragalla@...cinc.com, quic_sayalil@...cinc.com,
	quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com, quic_bhaskarv@...cinc.com,
	kernel@....qualcomm.com, Sachin Gupta <quic_sachgupt@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add Device tree parsing logic for
 DLL settings

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 05:05:14PM +0530, Ram Prakash Gupta wrote:
> From: Sachin Gupta <quic_sachgupt@...cinc.com>
> 
> This update introduces the capability to configure HS200
> and HS400 DLL settings via the device tree and parsing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Gupta <quic_sachgupt@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Prakash Gupta <quic_rampraka@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 36700735aa3e..d07f0105b733 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -265,6 +265,19 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_info {
>  	const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset;
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * DLL registers which needs be programmed with HSR settings.
> + * Add any new register only at the end and don't change the
> + * sequence.
> + */
> +struct sdhci_msm_dll {
> +	u32 dll_config[2];
> +	u32 dll_config_2[2];
> +	u32 dll_config_3[2];
> +	u32 dll_usr_ctl[2];
> +	u32 ddr_config[2];
> +};
> +
>  struct sdhci_msm_host {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev;
>  	void __iomem *core_mem;	/* MSM SDCC mapped address */
> @@ -273,6 +286,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
>  	struct clk *xo_clk;	/* TCXO clk needed for FLL feature of cm_dll*/
>  	/* core, iface, cal and sleep clocks */
>  	struct clk_bulk_data bulk_clks[4];
> +	struct sdhci_msm_dll dll;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO
>  	struct qcom_ice *ice;
>  #endif
> @@ -301,6 +315,7 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
>  	u32 dll_config;
>  	u32 ddr_config;
>  	bool vqmmc_enabled;
> +	bool artanis_dll;
>  };
>  
>  static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host)
> @@ -2516,6 +2531,73 @@ static int sdhci_msm_gcc_reset(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_host *host)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int sdhci_msm_dt_get_array(struct device *dev, const char *prop_name,
> +				  u32 **dll_table, int *len)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	u32 *arr = NULL;
> +	int ret = 0, sz = 0;
> +
> +	if (!np)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	if (!of_get_property(np, prop_name, &sz))

Don't add new users of of_get_property which adds untracked pointers to 
raw DT data.

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	sz = sz / sizeof(*arr);
> +	if (sz <= 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	arr = kcalloc(sz,  sizeof(*arr), GFP_KERNEL);

Why do you need to count the length first when only 5 entries is valid?

> +	if (!arr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, prop_name, arr, sz);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s failed reading array %d\n", prop_name, ret);
> +		*len = 0;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	*dll_table = arr;
> +	*len = sz;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdhci_msm_dt_parse_dll_info(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
> +{
> +	int dll_table_len, dll_reg_count;
> +	u32 *dll_table = NULL;
> +	int i, j;
> +
> +	msm_host->artanis_dll = false;
> +
> +	if (sdhci_msm_dt_get_array(dev, "qcom,dll-hsr-list",
> +				   &dll_table, &dll_table_len))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	dll_reg_count = sizeof(struct sdhci_msm_dll) / sizeof(u32);
> +
> +	if (dll_table_len != dll_reg_count) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Number of HSR entries are not matching\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;

You just leaked memory. devm_* functions are your friend.

> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0, j = 0; j < 2; i = i + 5, j++) {
> +		msm_host->dll.dll_config[j] = dll_table[i];
> +		msm_host->dll.dll_config_2[j] = dll_table[i + 1];
> +		msm_host->dll.dll_config_3[j] = dll_table[i + 2];
> +		msm_host->dll.dll_usr_ctl[j] = dll_table[i + 3];
> +		msm_host->dll.ddr_config[j] = dll_table[i + 4];
> +	}
> +
> +	msm_host->artanis_dll = true;
> +
> +	kfree(dll_table);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}