linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce bitfield and move register macro to rust/kernel/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72m1eiGVJHNyym+JwM=tQ9bGnmoW0+OuKQ3Vxo_AQOy5dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:42:41 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	dakr@...nel.org, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>, 
	joel@...lfernandes.org, Elle Rhumsaa <elle@...thered-steel.dev>, 
	Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>, 
	nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce bitfield and move register macro to rust/kernel/

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:36 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> We can assume maintainership of this of course, but is there a problem
> if this falls under the core Rust umbrella? As this is a pretty core
> functionality. Miguel and other core folks, WDYT?

I think what Yury may mean is that this should get an explicit
`MAINTAINERS` subentry even if it falls under `rust/kernel/` -- I
agree that is a good idea.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel