[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a3b5248-ff46-4aaf-9797-202f85ef9b23@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:22:41 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: exynos7870: relocate ${x}-names property
after ${x}
On 29/09/2025 19:01, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
> On 2025-09-28 21:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Sept 2025 at 01:44, Kaustabh Chakraborty
>> <kauschluss@...root.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> All ${x}-names properties are conventionally placed after their
>>> corresponding ${x} properties. For instance, 'clock-names' must follow
>>> 'clocks', 'interrupt-names' must follow 'interrupts'. Make necessary
>>> changes to follow said convention. No functional changes made.
>>>
>>
>> I don't intend to take such cosmetic changes, because they interfere
>> with stable back porting, unless we have a tool for such cleanup. Did
>> you use my prototype tool for that or some other tool?
>
> No, I did it manually. This is due to your first remark in [1] and
> my corresponding reply in [2]. What do I do here then?
I asked for the new code to follow this style, but I don't want to fix
yet existing code - before we come with a tool doing it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists