linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] driver core: fw_devlink: Don't warn about sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251007105358.6jgn25jnwjxafz6r@lcpd911>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:23:58 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki"
	<rafael@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner
	<heiko@...ech.de>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
        Sebin
 Francis <sebin.francis@...com>,
        Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
        Jon Hunter
	<jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver core: fw_devlink: Don't warn about
 sync_state() pending

On Oct 07, 2025 at 11:43:12 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Due to the wider deployment of the ->sync_state() support, for PM domains
> for example, we are receiving reports about the sync_state() pending
> message that is being logged in fw_devlink_dev_sync_state(). In particular
> as it's printed at the warning level, which is questionable.
> 
> Even if it certainly is useful to know that the ->sync_state() condition
> could not be met, there may be nothing wrong with it. For example, a driver
> may be built as module and are still waiting to be initialized/probed. For
> this reason let's move to the info level for now.
> 
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Reported-by: Sebin Francis <sebin.francis@...com>
> Reported-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>
> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Due to discussions on v1 and because the default Kconfig is to use the
> 	FW_DEVLINK_SYNC_STATE_STRICT, I suggest that for now it may be best to
> 	keep the warning level for the "Timed out.." print and only change the
> 	"sync_state pending..." message.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/base/core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index d22d6b23e758..c62e428b95b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -1784,7 +1784,7 @@ static int fw_devlink_dev_sync_state(struct device *dev, void *data)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	if (fw_devlink_sync_state == FW_DEVLINK_SYNC_STATE_STRICT) {
> -		dev_warn(sup, "sync_state() pending due to %s\n",
> +		dev_info(sup, "sync_state() pending due to %s\n",

Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated