[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251007142043.GA17089@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:20:43 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] seqlock: introduce scoped_seqlock_read() and
scoped_seqlock_read_irqsave()
OK, please see V2. scoped_seqlock_read_irqsave() uses the
"for (struct {} s ..." hack to make "ulong flags" local.
I can change scoped_seqlock_read() to do the same, to make
it symmetric with _irqsave() if you think it makes sense.
I've dropped 5/5 which changed __dentry_path() for now.
Oleg.
fs/proc/array.c | 9 ++------
fs/proc/base.c | 10 ++------
include/linux/seqlock.h | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 15 +++---------
4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists